Manage cookies
Title European probation order: What doesn’t work? Recommendations to overcome its underuse
Authors MONTERO PÉREZ DE TUDELA, ESTHER, GARCÍA RUIZ, CARMEN
External publication No
Means Crim. Crim. Justice
Scope Article
Nature Científica
JCR Quartile 2
SJR Quartile 1
JCR Impact 1.6
SJR Impact 0.473
Web https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148944713&doi=10.1177%2f17488958231153351&partnerID=40&md5=642d176f1b325e8fbc7b465ee69ecdad
Publication date 01/02/2023
ISI 000939625400001
Scopus Id 2-s2.0-85148944713
DOI 10.1177/17488958231153351
Abstract On 28 November 2008, the Council of the European Union (EU) adopted Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA, creating the European Probation Order (EPO). It allows EU citizens sentenced or subject to a probation decision to return to their own countries and implement there the alternative penalty or measure, where competent judicial authorities will supervise the execution of the probation measure. Despite the high number of EU nationals sentenced or punished in EU countries, EPO has been used sparingly. This article examines the obstacles facing its implementation, mainly the lack of knowledge about its utility and other EU probation systems or specific gaps of the norm, and provides proposals for overcoming them, such as more training and promotion of mutual knowledge, a common interpretation to get over the differences among systems and some form of annual monitoring of its use, in order to combat the current situation whereby foreigners are overrepresented in prison. © The Author(s) 2023.
Keywords Criminal justice; mutual trust; policy making; probation
Universidad Loyola members